Add a license

[nemobis]

This repository is currently proprietary, so no collaboration is possible. Please add a free license statement. The PDFs contain a "CC-BY 4.0" note so it's easier to align to that.

[kennypaterson]

There is no codebase for you to contribute to yet, but there will be soon. At that point, we will add a detailed licence statement. Our intention is to be as liberal as possible in this regard. Please bear with us.

[pierreozoux]

I see that this repo: https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend
has MPL License, great :) .

But the documents repo doesn't have a license which means it is proprietary.

A minor detail, that you probably just forgot, but I still think that this is important, hence my comment.

[bartclone]

Agreed. Did a PR previously, adding CC BY-SA 4.0 dcb9150 Issue was closed with remark: “we know, have to decide “ Alas... Op wo 22 apr. 2020 om 14:45 schreef Pierre Ozoux <notifications@github.com>

…

I see that this repo: https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend has MPL License, great :) . But the documents repo doesn't have a license which means it is proprietary. A minor detail, that you probably just forgot, but I still think that this is important, hence my comment. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA4W3VF4H5SSRYLETLLATILRN3RFHANCNFSM4L4NQ2RA> .