feat: support prettier-plugin-jsdoc

[aminya]

Fixes #21

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[dsherret]

Thanks @aminya and sorry for my delay. Would you be able to add a test for this in the ./tests/specs folder? That way we can ensure this works and keeps working. Thanks!

[aminya]

I get an error that exports is not defined. I tried to fix it by resolving to ES6 source code. However, It doesn't fix it.

[aminya]

I replaced EsBuild with Parceljs. Now, Parceljs correctly bundles the project making it possible to use it in the browser.

I also added a test for JSDoc formatting. All the tests pass.

[dsherret]

Thanks a lot for figuring this out, @aminya! Also, sorry for my delay.

I made a few changes to this PR in order to make the plugin opt-in since it doesn't seem that popular.

[aminya]

Thanks for merging.

I don't mind the opt-in option, but I think JSDoc is way more popular than Astro and Svelte. So the options are inconsistent.

[dsherret]

I was thinking both astro and svelte would be opt-in by asking the dprint-plugin-prettier plugin to format svelte/astro files or not? In the case of jsdoc it's intertwined in the js output.

[aminya]

Well, prettier-plugin-jsdoc also only works if the user uses TSDoc or JSDoc for documentation. The nature of the existence of a file format doesn't justify the feature. Or we could go the other way and enable all of them. As long as people can disable them, it should be fine.

[dsherret]

I’d rather this format TypeScript and JavaScript files out of the box the same way as prettier does, then people can opt in to the jsdoc plugin to change how ts/js files are formatted if they would like similar to how they have to opt in with prettier. Actually, maybe the option configuration should have the same structure as prettier does and be an array.