Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Misc] Enlarge default ReservedCodeCacheSize in aarch64 from 128m to 240m #567

Closed
sandlerwang opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Comments

@sandlerwang
Copy link
Collaborator

In current jdk8 community master branch. Default value of ReservedCodeCacheSize on aarch64 systems is 128m while on all other architectures, the value is 240m.
This difference may cause performance issues due to code cache full.
This patch set ReservedCodeCacheSize on aarch64 to 240m, the same as other architectures.

sandlerwang added a commit to sandlerwang/dragonwell8 that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2023
…240m

Summary: In current jdk8 community master branch. Default value of ReservedCodeCacheSize on aarch64 systems is 128m while on all other architectures, the value is 240m.
This difference may cause performance issues due to code cache full.
This patch set ReservedCodeCacheSize on aarch64 to 240m, the same as other architectures.

Test Plan: hotspot/test/codecache/TestDefaultCodeCacheSize.sh

Reviewed-by: kuaiwei, JoshuaZhuwj

Issue: dragonwell-project#567
sandlerwang added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2023
#568)

* [Misc] Enlarge default ReservedCodeCacheSize in aarch64 from 128m to 240m

Summary: In current jdk8 community master branch. Default value of ReservedCodeCacheSize on aarch64 systems is 128m while on all other architectures, the value is 240m.
This difference may cause performance issues due to code cache full.
This patch set ReservedCodeCacheSize on aarch64 to 240m, the same as other architectures.

Test Plan: hotspot/test/codecache/TestDefaultCodeCacheSize.sh

Reviewed-by: kuaiwei, JoshuaZhuwj

Issue: #567
@kuaiwei kuaiwei closed this as completed Aug 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants