Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small change for filter option when posting an entry #2060

Closed
rahaeli opened this issue Mar 30, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Small change for filter option when posting an entry #2060

rahaeli opened this issue Mar 30, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@rahaeli
Copy link
Contributor

rahaeli commented Mar 30, 2017

From suggestions: https://dw-suggestions.dreamwidth.org/1432037.html (by hebethen)

"Right now, in order to designate an entry as viewable by a certain filter, one must select 'Custom' from the 'Show this entry to:' dropdown menu. Only then do the individual filters show up as checkboxes. I think it would be clearer if the option said something like 'Access Filter', or if the filter checkboxes were visible from the get-go."

This change is moot in the beta update page (how security is labeled is entirely different), so I just went and edited label.security.custom on the live DW site to be "Access Filter" via translation system.

@rahaeli
Copy link
Contributor Author

rahaeli commented Mar 30, 2017

String changed via translation system!

@rahaeli rahaeli closed this as completed Mar 30, 2017
@kareila
Copy link
Member

kareila commented Apr 30, 2017

We got some pushback on this change from someone with accessibility issues: http://dw-maintenance.dreamwidth.org/76052.html?thread=2798612#cmt2798612

@azurelunatic
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder if "Filtered access" would answer?

@rahaeli
Copy link
Contributor Author

rahaeli commented May 1, 2017

Changing, using Azz's suggestion!

(EDIT: Hmm, looking at it post-change & rereading people's opinions, Imma change it to "custom filter" instead.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants