Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Heiman HS3SA-E #5296

Closed
saxn-paule opened this issue Sep 13, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Heiman HS3SA-E #5296

saxn-paule opened this issue Sep 13, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@saxn-paule
Copy link

saxn-paule commented Sep 13, 2021

Device

  • Product name: Heiman HS3SA-E
  • Manufacturer: 0x120b
  • Model identifier: As per deCONZ GUI Basic cluster.
  • Device type : Please remove all unrelated device types.
    • Sensor
    • Siren

Screenshots

I got two of the HS3SA-E smoke detectors. Pairing via Phoscon was possible, but it's always shown as not reachable:
image

Via Home-Assistant three entities are detected:
image

But they don't provide a status. In case of testing the alarm function nothing happens in Phoscon/HA.

It also doesn't show a green line:
image

image

Basic

Identify

Alarms

Device Temperature

Groups

Scenes

On/Off

Level Control

Color Control

Simple Metering

Diagnostics

Other clusters that are not mentioned above

@Mimiix
Copy link
Collaborator

Mimiix commented Sep 13, 2021

Hi,

This is not a device request nor a bug but a user question.

All of these are redirect to the forums as noted in #5113 :

https://forum.phoscon.de

@Mimiix Mimiix closed this as completed Sep 13, 2021
@saxn-paule
Copy link
Author

@Mimiix This device is not part of the supported devices List and also doesn't work properly, so in my opinion it is a device request.

@Mimiix
Copy link
Collaborator

Mimiix commented Sep 13, 2021

It showing "Not reachable" has nothing to do with it being supported or not and often points to user questions.

Secondly, if it wasn't supoorted, it wouldn't show in Phoscon or deconz at all: Devices need to be whitelisted.

On an ending note: The correct way would use the original issue , which you did: #1021 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants