DDF for Heiman SmartPlug #6853
Merged
DDF for Heiman SmartPlug #6853
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have two of these models, an older one that exposes neither SW Version ID nor Date Code and a newer one with Date Code of
2018.1.11. Soswversionis based on the date code, andnullfor the older model.The fingerprints in this DDF should get rid of all the "Missing cluster in sensor fingerprint" messages.
I've removed the
state.powerfrom the ZHAConsumption resource. This was completely redundant, as it was also exposed on the ZHAPower resource. The ZHAConsumptionpowerwas based on the Instantaneous Demand attribute of the Simple Metering cluster; the ZHAPower on the Active Power of Electrical Management. The device reports the same value on both clusters.However, because the device only has room for attribute reporting for five attributes, Instantaneous Demand had to be polled, and would run behind Active Power. I really don't like deCONZ polling the attribute and it seems better to remove it altogether.