Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downlink header isn't linked correctly #49

Open
annevk opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 11 comments
Open

Downlink header isn't linked correctly #49

annevk opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 11 comments

Comments

@annevk
Copy link

annevk commented Jun 8, 2018

Not sure where it's documented now though...

@annevk
Copy link
Author

annevk commented Jun 8, 2018

@dret
Copy link
Owner

dret commented Jun 8, 2018 via email

@annevk
Copy link
Author

annevk commented Jun 8, 2018

That draft notes downlink got removed.

@dret
Copy link
Owner

dret commented Jun 8, 2018 via email

@dret
Copy link
Owner

dret commented Jun 8, 2018

i am just being lazy here, because the current machinery doesn't support the type of document you were linking to: is that document going to enter the regular @w3c TR track anytime soon? if so, i will probably be lazy and just wait for that. if not, i may have to tweak the machinery a little... thanks!

@annevk
Copy link
Author

annevk commented Jun 8, 2018

I suspect Ilya will know that. I do think Chrome may already emit this header.

@igrigorik
Copy link

NetInfo is under WICG, it's not possible to link that?

Re, Downlink status: https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5407907378102272

@dret
Copy link
Owner

dret commented Jun 8, 2018 via email

@dret
Copy link
Owner

dret commented Jun 8, 2018 via email

@igrigorik
Copy link

@w3c TR track in the not-too-distant future.

It's been in WICG for the last 3+ years, I don't expect that to change in the short term.

@dret
Copy link
Owner

dret commented Jun 8, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants