Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: create hex package #9

Closed
chvanikoff opened this issue Mar 5, 2015 · 10 comments
Closed

Proposal: create hex package #9

chvanikoff opened this issue Mar 5, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

@chvanikoff
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
How about publishing this lib to http://hex.pm? (https://hex.pm/docs/publish)

@edgurgel
Copy link
Collaborator

edgurgel commented Mar 5, 2015

To accomplish this we would need to publish these first:

{:pooler, github: "seth/pooler", tag: "1.3.3"},
{:riak_pb, github: "basho/riak_pb", override: true, tag: "2.0.0.16", compile: "./rebar get-deps compile deps_dir=../"},
{:riakc, github: "basho/riak-erlang-client", tag: "2.0.1"} ]

Git dependencies are not handled by hex, so people would need to add riak-elixir-client + these 3 above.

@drewkerrigan
Copy link
Owner

Yes I'd like to publish to hex asap. I'll probably end up forking the git deps and adding them to hex.

@lpil
Copy link

lpil commented Oct 12, 2015

👍

@drewkerrigan
Copy link
Owner

It was messy, but I managed to get all of the deps and sub-deps into hex, and finally got this into hex:

https://hex.pm/packages/riak

@lpil
Copy link

lpil commented Nov 13, 2015

Thanks :)

@edgurgel
Copy link
Collaborator

@drewkerrigan shall we tag/release on github the same commit hash so we keep them sync'd?

@drewkerrigan
Copy link
Owner

Yes I think that makes sense

@chvanikoff
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great news, thanks! 👍

@drewkerrigan
Copy link
Owner

@edgurgel v1.0.0 has been tagged by the way

@edgurgel
Copy link
Collaborator

Awesome! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants