Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

display size of dh-params for dh-cipher-suites #106

Closed
rogerthat opened this issue May 21, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

display size of dh-params for dh-cipher-suites #106

rogerthat opened this issue May 21, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
duplicate enhancement

Comments

@rogerthat
Copy link

it would be nice to display the bits/size of dh-params, if dh-suites are used, like ssllabs is doing when showing the ciphers used.

would be perfect to analyse esp. mailservers

dh-params
@drwetter
Copy link
Owner

see also #85

drwetter added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2015
@drwetter
- dh key lenghth in negotiated cipher at first, see $85, #105, #106
e58b53e 
- got rid of ok function calls in protocols
- detection of apache banner win32/win64
@drwetter drwetter mentioned this issue May 26, 2015
Closed
@drwetter drwetter mentioned this issue Jun 16, 2015
Closed
drwetter added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2015
@drwetter
- dh key lenghth in negotiated cipher at first, see $85, #105, #106
8a458d6 
- got rid of ok function calls in protocols
- detection of apache banner win32/win64
drwetter added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2015
@drwetter
- for pfs. allciphers and cipher_per_proto we WARN now because of wea…
f8935bd 
…k DH param (if openssl supports it)

  FIX #106, $85
- logjam not yet named *#105, #107) but addressed
- --openssl switch
- reorder find_openssl_binary / mybanner
- proper identation of help
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
duplicate enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rogerthat @drwetter