Built-in predicate names

[kstenerud]

The names chosen for some of the built-in predicates don't match those commonly used in other languages, increasing cognitive load and the potential for user error. Please consider using the common names instead:

dry	common
eql	eq
gt	gt
gteq	ge
lt	lt
lteq	le

[igor-alexandrov]

Arel has eq, gteq and lteq: https://www.rubydoc.info/github/rails/arel/Arel/Predications.

Based on my experience, I think that eql can be confusing, but gteq and lteq are common used in Ruby.

[solnic]

Given that we have 4 years of history with these predicates, I don't think it's worth the effort to change it now, especially that:

• gteq? and lteq? are used in other gems
• eql? is called eql? because it uses Object#eql? which makes a lot of sense, let's be consistent with the method name especially that there are differences in behavior between == and eql?