Added codecov support

[TraGicCode]

This enabled code coverage.

Fixes #18

This change is 

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (dev@8be95b9). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@         Coverage Diff          @@
##             dev    #19   +/-   ##
====================================
  Coverage       ?   100%           
====================================
  Files          ?      1           
  Lines          ?     13           
  Branches       ?      0           
====================================
  Hits           ?     13           
  Misses         ?      0           
  Partials       ?      0

[TraGicCode]

@johlju What needs to be done to fix the pip install error at the bottom of appveyor?

[johlju]

Hmm... That seems yet as a new problem, the last error you get we started seeing a while back, see issue PowerShell/DscResource.Tests#203.
It doesn't affect uploading to Codecov (yet), see the file codeCovUpload.log here https://ci.appveyor.com/project/PowerShell/xpowershellexecutionpolicy/build/1.0.66.0/artifacts, it uploads successfully.

Since the problem are escalating we should move to the alternate method mentioned in one of the last comments in the above issue in the DscResource.Tests repo.

[johlju]

@TraGicCode Please rebase this PR and resolve the merge conflicts. Please use git rebase (and not git pull or git merge). 😃

[johlju]

@TraGicCode Remember to add the Codecov badges, looked like they warn't part of the PR? 😃

[TraGicCode]

Hey @johlju,

I rebased to fix the merge conflict along with adding the codecov badges to the readme. In regards to the python issue i'm not following what alternate method we should use for this.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[johlju]

@TraGicCode Ah, sorry, it was just thinking loud that we (as in the community), in the DscResource.Tests repo, should move the test framework to use an alternate method to uploading the Codecov file. You don't have to do anything in this PR. :) We ignore the errors for now.

I will review this one in a bit. 😃

[johlju]

Reviewed 2 of 3 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.

---

appveyor.yml, line 1 at r2 (raw file):

################################################################################

Please remove this comment block (line 1-9)

---

appveyor.yml, line 15 at r2 (raw file):

1.0.{build}

Please change this to 1.1.{build}.0 which is the version in the file in the dev branch.
Please remove the 'TODO:' comment.

---

appveyor.yml, line 34 at r2 (raw file):

test_script:
    - ps: |
        # TODO:

Please remove the TODO: comment block (line 34-36)

---

README.md, line 21 at r2 (raw file):

branch/master

We should set this to 'branch/dev' (at two locations in this line)

---

Comments from Reviewable

[TraGicCode]

Review status: 1 of 3 files reviewed at latest revision, 4 unresolved discussions.

---

appveyor.yml, line 1 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, johlju (Johan Ljunggren) wrote…

Please remove this comment block (line 1-9)

Done.

---

appveyor.yml, line 15 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, johlju (Johan Ljunggren) wrote…

1.0.{build}

Please change this to 1.1.{build}.0 which is the version in the file in the dev branch.
Please remove the 'TODO:' comment.

Done.

---

appveyor.yml, line 34 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, johlju (Johan Ljunggren) wrote…

Please remove the TODO: comment block (line 34-36)

Done.

---

README.md, line 21 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, johlju (Johan Ljunggren) wrote…

branch/master

We should set this to 'branch/dev' (at two locations in this line)

Done.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[johlju]

---

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r3.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.

---

Comments from Reviewable