You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In complex networks, it would be useful to know if a node is connected to another one in an indirect way.
The getter functions from network_interface, get_base_connected_nodes and get_current_connected_nodes, returns only (as far as I have understood) the nodes directly (edge =1) connected to an input node.
Instead the networkx function node_connectivity(input_graph, node_to_check, specific_node) returns all the possible paths that connects the node_to_check to a target_node (0 if there are none, 1/2/N depending on how many paths are present).
In this way it can be possible to check and count how many nodes are affected in case of the isolation of a gateway node to preserve a high_value_target or similar decisions.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for raising this suggestion. This has been added to the backlog of our internal issue tracker (Jira issue AIDT-123) as a community feature request. I will provide an update once we've had a chance to look into this.
Thanks again for your contributions to Yawning-Titan!
Hello,
In complex networks, it would be useful to know if a node is connected to another one in an indirect way.
The getter functions from network_interface, get_base_connected_nodes and get_current_connected_nodes, returns only (as far as I have understood) the nodes directly (edge =1) connected to an input node.
Instead the networkx function node_connectivity(input_graph, node_to_check, specific_node) returns all the possible paths that connects the node_to_check to a target_node (0 if there are none, 1/2/N depending on how many paths are present).
In this way it can be possible to check and count how many nodes are affected in case of the isolation of a gateway node to preserve a high_value_target or similar decisions.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: