Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse const generics on methods with feature(full) #816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 25, 2020

Conversation

yodaldevoid
Copy link
Contributor

I must admit I have not extensively tested this, but the code is simple enough and taken from the support for const generics on types so I have a lot of confidence in this.

@yodaldevoid
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DutchGhost This should fix the problem you were talking about on #264 if you are using feature(full).

Copy link
Owner

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@dtolnay dtolnay merged commit a046ae9 into dtolnay:master May 25, 2020
@yodaldevoid yodaldevoid deleted the const_generic_methods branch May 25, 2020 01:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants