You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<figcaption>Figure 1: Two of the existing approaches to using posterior predictive simulations to assess model adequacy in Bayesian phylogenetics. (a) One group of methods use characteristics of the data for model assessment, like the multinomial likelihood or the GC content. (b) Another method can assess clock models using estimates from clock-free methods. Under this approach, the number of substitutions per site expected along each branch under the clock hierarchical model are compared with those inferred in a clock-free analysis of the empirical data.</figcaption>
228
228
</figure>
229
229
<br>
@@ -326,14 +326,13 @@ multinomial likelihood in R:
<figcaption>Figure 2: Distribution of PPS multinomial likelihood values with the value of the test statistic for the empirical data shown as a vertical line in red.</figcaption>
331
331
</figure>
332
332
<br>
333
333
334
334
335
-
### Results of clock model
336
-
assessment
335
+
### Results of clock model assessment
337
336
338
337
The following script shows a simple example to explore the branch-wise
339
338
posterior predictive *P*-values. We will first load the tree. In
0 commit comments