Allow file_row_number with parquet schema option #9290
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lnkuiper
suggested changes
Oct 13, 2023
|
Thanks! LGTM |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Building on @lnkuiper's earlier work #9123, this PR should complete the changes required in DuckDB to support scanning iceberg schema with the iceberg extension.
I've tested this feature with a dev branch of the iceberg extension which seems to work well, allowing us to properly read the iceberg schema which may be different from the parquet schema due to schema evolution. This now enables us to support schema evolution in iceberg.
TODOs