New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Failed runs missing from the job-specific log page #4829
Comments
This sounds like Combine logs in GUI #1152. Sounds undesired and unintended but due to unstated technical reasons.
The database LogData table looks like a backup actually writes the results when it has them -- unless it errors out early.
Even though the log is structured data, I don't know why there couldn't be a version with a little error info and no more. |
This issue has been mentioned on Duplicati. There might be relevant details there: https://forum.duplicati.com/t/improve-result-reporting/16407/17 |
Add a new 'Interrupted' field to IBasicResult. Interrupted and failed backups are recorded in the job log (duplicati#4829). When the backup is interrupted or fails, metadata for the server is not updated (duplicati#4344).
This issue has been mentioned on Duplicati. There might be relevant details there: https://forum.duplicati.com/t/only-restores-empty-folders/17153/7 |
Environment info
Description
When a backup job fails, the failures only appear on the general server page (the one for all backups), and not on the log page of the individual backup job that failed. As an example, I have this job running daily. It failed consecutively on Oct 1, 2, 3, etc, but these failures don't show up (is it only for me? is this the intended behavior for some reason?)
Steps to reproduce
This happens with every backup failure, so in order to reproduce, just cause a backup to fail (e.g. wrong user/pass for FTP; or any other way).
Expected: all backup attempts show up in the log (not only the successful ones), with a minimum of "Backup failed" title, ideally with some short description of the error (e.g. "host unreachable"), but this latter part is of course lower prio.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: