Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eslint-config-dustinspecker to version 0.3.0 πŸš€ #14

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello πŸ‘‹

πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€

eslint-config-dustinspecker just published its new version 0.3.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of eslint-config-dustinspecker – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 16 commits .

  • f57e707 chore(release): bump version to 0.3.0
  • 499d5b3 feat(rules): move semi and func-style out of jsx
  • 171ac7d chore(deps): use babel-register instead of babel-core
  • 8728115 fix(eslint): remove use strict directive
  • f606dbc chore(pkg): alphabetize scripts
  • 58a2877 chore(pkg): remove gulp usage
  • 6245087 chore(rules): use es2015 features to write configs
  • 1173b21 chore(pkg): remove unused chai
  • 88aebc8 chore(test): use AVA
  • 1c3b464 style(test): alphabetize imports
  • 2f7a136 chore(release): bump version to 0.2.6
  • 4852c8e fix(readme): add missing "
  • 2cb506d docs(readme): add note about react dependency
  • 30bf8f6 docs(readme): add jsx usage
  • 9a13c29 chore(jsx): remove duplicate rule

There are 16 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚑

@dustinspecker dustinspecker deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-config-dustinspecker-0.3.0 branch January 17, 2016 00:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants