New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gaps In Packing #124
Comments
Hello Thanks for the report. I've built a testcase that confirms this behaviour, and from inspection so far I think I can see where there is potentially opportunity for some improvement that would allow this particular example to be packed better. I don't think it applies to this testcase but please note that by rotating the dimensions of the box around that the packing will occur along a different face of the box than before and that some orientation decisions will therefore vary as stability is taken into account |
Sorry, I meant to reply sooner. Thanks for getting back to me! I did notice that by rotating the dimensions it packed the box correctly. Cheers, |
First I just want to say this is an excellent system and works well in the majority of cases. Thanks!
I've experienced a weird quirk though where it kept splitting the items into 2 boxes. Here's what I was using:
Result:
Box 1 -> Contents[Item 1, Item 2], Box 2 -> Contents[Item 3]
The system packs the first 2 items correctly but cannot pack the last item beside item 2 and instead grabs a second box. When the system calls a new row the packing room left and XYZ are as follows:
However by rotating the box dimensions the system correctly packs everything into a single box.
Box 1 - 4x14x11
Result:
Box 1 -> Contents{Item 1, Item 2, Item 3}
Cheers,
Joel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: