Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How about the results without jointly training on COCO #22

Closed
ghost opened this issue Jan 6, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

How about the results without jointly training on COCO #22

ghost opened this issue Jan 6, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 6, 2018

Hi, would you like to share the results which do not adopt jointly training on coco dataset.
Best

@dvornikita
Copy link
Owner

Hi, I don't understand what result you mean. Can you clarify?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jan 11, 2018

Thanks for your reply. I mean the coco 2015 test-dev results of the model just use detection annotations to train, without using any segmentation annotations.
Best

@dvornikita
Copy link
Owner

In table 5 of the original paper, we report gains in accuracy with joint training on COCO minival2014. Since the performance of the model trained on a single task only is not the purpose of our work we don't report it on the test set.
However, if you are interested, you can obtain these results using the code in this repo.
Best

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jan 11, 2018

oh, yes, thanks for your reply again.
Best,

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Jan 11, 2018
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant