Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure minimum size of tomb matches FS requirements #68

Closed
hellekin opened this issue Nov 7, 2011 · 4 comments
Closed

Ensure minimum size of tomb matches FS requirements #68

hellekin opened this issue Nov 7, 2011 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@hellekin
Copy link
Contributor

hellekin commented Nov 7, 2011

Tomb allows for creation of too small tomb that the underlying file system cannot use.

e.g. tomb create -s1 is valid, but won't work. (Ext2 needs at least 4M)

@davinerd
Copy link
Member

davinerd commented Nov 7, 2011

Il 07/11/2011 17:12, Hellekin O. Wolf ha scritto:

Tomb allows for creation of too small tomb that the underlying file system cannot use.

e.g. tomb create -s1 is valid, but won't work. (Ext2 needs at least 4M)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#68

This will be related to #45 (option to choose tomb filesystem), and I'll
working on it (#45) as soon as possible, and fixing #68 :)

Anathema

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
|GPG/PGP KeyID: 0F26965C available on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ |
|Fingerprint: F808 18A2 2E7D 6E7A 7A18 4062 0AA3 7BF2 0F26 965C |
| |
|http://www.msack.org |
|https://tboxes.tracciabi.li/anathema
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

@boyska
Copy link
Contributor

boyska commented Jan 22, 2012

can't we just put a one-fits-all lowerbound, like 10M ? I really doubt this size is "too big" for anyone.
And if this, as always, -f will override it, falling back to current behaviour

@davinerd
Copy link
Member

On 22/01/2012 23:56, BoySka wrote:

can't we just put a one-fits-all lowerbound, like 10M ? I really doubt this size is "too big" for anyone.
And if this, as always, -f will override it, falling back to current behaviour

No, since xfs need at least about 20M.
I can make a switch case with it, no problem.
Let me code, and I'll show you soon.

Anathema

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
|GPG/PGP KeyID: 0F26965C available on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/ |
|Fingerprint: F808 18A2 2E7D 6E7A 7A18 4062 0AA3 7BF2 0F26 965C |
| |
|http://www.msack.org |
|https://tboxes.tracciabi.li/anathema
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

@boyska
Copy link
Contributor

boyska commented Jan 23, 2012

such a solution is fine.
I just want to see this issue closed, don't care HOW :D

jaromil added a commit that referenced this issue May 27, 2013
Most filesystems can't deal with less than 10 MiB space
closes issue #68
@jaromil jaromil closed this as completed May 27, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants