Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatically link hash tags #245

Open
evanp opened this issue Dec 5, 2012 · 18 comments
Open

Automatically link hash tags #245

evanp opened this issue Dec 5, 2012 · 18 comments
Milestone

Comments

@evanp
Copy link
Contributor

evanp commented Dec 5, 2012

If someone types #hashtag, it should be automatically linked.

@Erkan-Yilmaz
Copy link

  1. I was missing this at first time user
  2. later I discovered one can add links, so it could be replaced in theory with a link until it's implemented

priotizing needed

@evanp
Copy link
Contributor Author

evanp commented Jan 26, 2013

I'm of two minds on this.

One is that we've already got addressing outside the content area, so maybe it makes sense to do tagging there, too? Lots of systems (like Delicious, Wordpress and Flickr) do this for tags.

The other is that people like hashtags.

@Erkan-Yilmaz
Copy link

How about making the feature redundant (so: at both places)?
As you say people are used to it and would miss it as a new user

@evanp
Copy link
Contributor Author

evanp commented Jan 26, 2013

Well, I think the whole point of leaving it out is so it doesn't clutter up the content area.

Without length restrictions, it doesn't make sense to jam all the metadata into the content area. And it looks kind of blecherous.

@maiki
Copy link

maiki commented Jan 26, 2013

I would opt to leave metadata as a separate field. I like intentionally linking, and auto-hashtags could muddle that up (I realize that an octothorp is used because it is unlikely to be used otherwise). Something I picked up from seeing folks mostly linking to Twitter stuff on other sites is to link @name and #hashtag to their respective pages on Twitter.

At any rate, I suggest we don't auto-link them. ^_^

@clacke
Copy link

clacke commented Apr 2, 2013

One idea would be to allow hashtags in the text to cause metadata tags to appear automatically, but not linking from within the text itself, possibly even removing the hash in the text. So the tag field or whatever would be the official mechanism, but hashtags would be a shortcut.

@clacke
Copy link

clacke commented Apr 2, 2013

I like how hashtags minimize the effort necessary to create data, just like CamelCase on the original wiki did.

@evanp
Copy link
Contributor Author

evanp commented Apr 2, 2013

I think in-text hashtags might have gone too far for us to ignore them completely.

@erincandescent
Copy link

Have the editor do the interpretation and drop the hash (preferably live as you edit - like the Facebook rerefence system)? I.E. the editor would turn #something into a hypothetical <a href="/tag/something">something</a>

I'm of the same opinion for @mentions

(I'm thinking info-bubble popups and such could be done by doing WebFinger discovery for an "activitystreams object" from the given URL)

@portenkirchner
Copy link

Unfortunately identi.ca got less useful and fun without groups and hashtags.
Linked hashtags would be really useful to follow certain topics or events and would be helpful to find new interesting people.

@bshanks
Copy link

bshanks commented Apr 5, 2014

+1

@vasyugan
Copy link

vasyugan commented Sep 1, 2014

Hashtags are essential for interaction and for discovering content. Without groups and hashtags, identi.ca has been virtually dead for me. The stream of information I get has dried up almost completely,

@kocio-pl
Copy link

kocio-pl commented Sep 2, 2015

+1

@augusto-herrmann
Copy link

+1
This is the reason I stopped using identi.ca a long time ago.

@strugee
Copy link
Member

strugee commented Jun 3, 2016

@augusto-herrmann hey, thanks for being a part of the community!

Unfortunately, commenting "+1" without adding any new information is frowned upon. It doesn't really help, and it just creates more noise for the developers to go through. Rest assured that this is on our radar, and we'll get to it when we can.

@strugee
Copy link
Member

strugee commented Jun 3, 2016

Or, alternately, you could write a prototype of this feature yourself. I'd be happy to review your Pull Request.

@Flashwalker
Copy link

Hey, pump.io have no tags? Really?
You are sure it's blogging thing?
It's a really big gap for things like blog.

@strugee
Copy link
Member

strugee commented Dec 17, 2016

@Flashwalker as I alluded to above, everyone working on pump.io is a volunteer. If you think hashtags are important, that's great! I'd encourage you to put your money where your mouth is and send a Pull Request implementing this feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

13 participants