Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

get rid of hardcoding BLAS libs in easyblocks #155

Merged
merged 18 commits into from Mar 28, 2013

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Mar 27, 2013

No description provided.

lapack_libs.try_function_by_elem('change', prefix='', prefix_begin_end='-Wl:',
separator=',', separator_begin_end=',')
lapack_libs.SEPARATOR = ','
lapack = str(lapack_libs)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@boegel isn't this also needed for the fftw configuration? (i saw the easybuildlog of earlier builds that it isn't, dunno if it matters or not)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, good point.

I think it is needed, and that we've been building numpy without FFT support with ictce up until now... I'll look into it, good catch.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 27, 2013

@stdweird: Fixed remark, please rerereview.

@stdweird
Copy link
Contributor

might just work, regtests will tell ;)

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 28, 2013

Fully tested, Python+numpy_scipy builds as expected with goolf and ictce using this. Merging it in.

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2013
get rid of hardcoding BLAS libs in easyblocks
@boegel boegel merged commit 66dce79 into easybuilders:develop Mar 28, 2013
@boegel boegel deleted the fixes_for_OpenBLAS_goolf branch March 28, 2013 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants