Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for Bazel (bazel.py) #3102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

branfosj
Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj commented Jan 28, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

  • No use of EB_Bazel in easyconfigs or blocks

@branfosj branfosj added this to the 5.0 milestone Jan 28, 2024
@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

  • SUCCESS Bazel-3.7.2-GCCcore-10.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-3.7.2-GCCcore-11.2.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-4.2.2-GCCcore-11.2.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-5.1.1-GCCcore-11.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-6.3.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-6.3.1-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Zip-3.0-GCCcore-9.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Zip-3.0-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-0.29.1-GCCcore-9.3.0-Java-1.8.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-2.0.0-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-3.6.0-GCCcore-9.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS Bazel-3.7.2-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb

Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (10 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/023c09126814a8b35cea2c65264f2409 for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj changed the title replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in bazel.py replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for ADF (bazel.py) Jan 29, 2024
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jan 29, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_BRANCH=5.0.x
EB_ARGS="Bazel-6.3.1-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb"

@boegel boegel changed the title replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for ADF (bazel.py) replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for Bazel (bazel.py) Jan 29, 2024
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegelbot
Copy link

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ "5.0.x" != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH="5.0.x" ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/"5.0.x" source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=3102 EB_ARGS="Bazel-6.3.1-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb" EB_REPO=easybuild-easyblocks EB_BRANCH="5.0.x" /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_3102 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3503

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1914425653 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link

Test report by @boegelbot

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

  • SUCCESS Bazel-6.3.1-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb

Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/e7274c6bba3909675f8459ea22e7713e for a full test report.

@boegel boegel merged commit 88bb44d into easybuilders:5.0.x Jan 29, 2024
17 checks passed
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20240128173721_new_pr_bazel branch January 29, 2024 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants