add patch for TensorFlow 2.3.1 to fix installation on Arm64

[boegel]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11614 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11614 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 9695

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 721836290 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3403.kirlia.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240 CPU @ 2.60GHz (cascadelake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/b5bc5598acc452b4e15870fee1e76771 for a full test report.

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/ed5344a6123430658aa0620cd7e8f333 for a full test report.

[verdurin]

@boegel do we need a build report from an ARM64 box to check the fix works, as well as that it doesn't break on other architectures?

[akesandgren]

Perhaps we should have arch-labels on the PRs which would then require a test report from such an arch to be able to merge?

[boegel]

@verdurin Yes, we should have a test report from an Arm64 box here, I'll work on that.

@akesandgren Yeah, we should get a bit more organized there...

[terjekv]

Test report by @terjekv
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 46 out of 46 (2 easyconfigs in total)
arm2 - Linux ubuntu 18.04, AArch64, UNKNOWN, Python 3.6.9
See https://gist.github.com/234c896e70529cdeb52aba909fead8ea for a full test report.

[boegel]

@verdurin Test report from an Arm64 system done, see @terjekv's test report, so good to go?

[verdurin]

Looks fine.

[verdurin]

Going in, thanks @boegel!