Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{lib}[fosscuda/2019b] TensorFlow v1.15.5 w/ Python 3.7.4 #12037

Merged

Conversation

Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor

@Flamefire Flamefire commented Jan 22, 2021

(created using eb --new-pr)

This adds the most current TF 1.x ECs. At our site it was asked for a TF 1.15.4+ by people working with DeepSpeech and especially a non-MPI version was requested. As it might be relevant to others I added both here. Feel free to decide to drop the regular one as we already have a 1.15.2

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
taurusml4 - Linux RHEL 7.6, POWER, 8335-GTX, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/2f970cfe75bfcf49708b0e4293c2b69c for a full test report.

@Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
taurusa5 - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v4 @ 1.70GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/2a9009a0242e60492bfd6dbae3ecd3c9 for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta added this to the 4.x milestone Jan 26, 2021
@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12037 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12037 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13697

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 767277998 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-5 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/077c3aaf14c4b1cbbe86a59f52a84d6a for a full test report.

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.3.3?) Feb 4, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 4, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node3504.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f5f275146055fdba9878d8bf952c44eb for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 4, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node3104.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/75af4ee1fffbbfe5326b877920e2e0ba for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 4, 2021

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2314
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node2618.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/590e810021629367ca305cf95929d54d for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 7, 2021

Going in, thanks @Flamefire!

@boegel boegel merged commit c5c8f40 into easybuilders:develop Feb 7, 2021
@Flamefire Flamefire deleted the 20210122174613_new_pr_TensorFlow1155 branch February 8, 2021 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants