Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{vis}[foss/2021a] OpenCV v4.5.3 w/ Python 3.9.5 (+ CUDA 11.3.1) #14115

Conversation

branfosj
Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj commented Oct 8, 2021

@branfosj branfosj added the update label Oct 8, 2021
@branfosj branfosj marked this pull request as draft October 8, 2021 08:47
@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

branfosj commented Oct 8, 2021

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.3, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8617c6f41a7a5daa87d87fe5cb1cadc9 for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2021 10:15
@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

branfosj commented Oct 8, 2021

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 13 out of 13 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0212u25a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.3, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz (broadwell), 1 x NVIDIA Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB, 460.32.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/363df675f46305fabbc87ff1376a3b92 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2591"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14115 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2591" /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14115 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 7057

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 939092281 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2591
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/811ed84b39482ed5635ba182e382f007 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2591
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
rocky8-eb - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6900K CPU @ 3.20GHz (broadwell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/4c2ad219cfa253cd53d889da6a135c03 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2591
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
jsfc060 - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/466194ae12f1a36181a99445f5c8fdb2 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@SebastianAchilles SebastianAchilles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @branfosj!

@SebastianAchilles SebastianAchilles merged commit ccaae76 into easybuilders:develop Oct 12, 2021
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20211008094251_new_pr_OpenCV453 branch October 12, 2021 14:01
@boegel boegel changed the title {vis}[foss/2021a] OpenCV v4.5.3 w/ Python 3.9.5 {vis}[foss/2021a] OpenCV v4.5.3 w/ Python 3.9.5 (+ CUDA 11.3.1) Dec 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants