Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{devel}[system/system] ReFrame v4.0.1 #17116

Merged

Conversation

akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@akesandgren akesandgren added this to the 4.x milestone Jan 16, 2023
@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
b-an02.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz, Python 3.8.10
See https://gist.github.com/2657463672e1a15c3c08bb20ba6ea5ca for a full test report.

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Jan 16, 2023

Test report by @smoors
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node312.hydra.os - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/ca3480ec689a01f76f3f1979bcbef2c2 for a full test report.

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

@boegelbot Please test @ generoso

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

@boegelbot Please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@akesandgren: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=17116 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_17116 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 2042

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1384901444 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/3fcda8bcd390a588e26227d49761680e for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/9934888b69e450426c43c553a4021083 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@verdurin verdurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

@verdurin verdurin modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.7.1?) Jan 17, 2023
@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @akesandgren!

@verdurin verdurin merged commit 6a9d87f into easybuilders:develop Jan 17, 2023
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Jan 17, 2023

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17116 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17116 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9992

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1385102789 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b68b6fd5e049e439398705cfb5f9865a for a full test report.

@akesandgren akesandgren deleted the 20230116130846_new_pr_ReFrame401 branch January 17, 2023 10:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants