consistently use NanoFilt capitalisation

[branfosj]

NanoFilt capitalisation looks right to me.

for #11824

[branfosj]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17349 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17349 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 10246

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1431833172 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[Micket]

lgtm

[Micket]

Do we care to test build these? toolchains are older than what i have in my test tree so i don't wanna

[branfosj]

Do we care to test build these? toolchains are older than what i have in my test tree so i don't wanna

I've set a build off and will see how it goes. The starting point is "0 out of 72 easyconfigs done", so not as bad as I feared. However, we'll have to see if I can build all the dependencies in these older toolchains.

[verdurin]

Test report by @verdurin
FAILED
Build succeeded for 8 out of 16 (4 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/a6b58379e5bf80410d2d46afec1ddbaa for a full test report.

[branfosj]

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u08b.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/471c61356c50b39b2e238faac1a6830d for a full test report.

[Micket]

Good enough for me!