{bio}[foss/2021b] Vamb v3.0.9 w/ Python 3.9.6

[akesandgren]

(created using eb --new-pr)

Requires

• {ai}[foss/2021b] PyTorch v1.12.1 w/ Python 3.9.6 w/ CUDA 11.4.1 #17154

so is mostly a placeholder for a version using a more recent toolchain

[akesandgren]

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
b-an02.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz, Python 3.8.10
See https://gist.github.com/8eef3fb2f425a73f858207a1ffc22f69 for a full test report.

[smoors]

@akesandgren the pytorch dep has been abandoned in favor of PyTorch-1.12.1-foss-2021b-CUDA-11.5.2.eb

[akesandgren]

Yeah, the problem there is that everything else uses CUDA-11.4.1 for foss-2021b, so technically it's PyTorch that is wrong.
But I'll update so we can finish this one...

[akesandgren]

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
b-cn1603.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core Processor, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, 525.147.05, Python 3.10.12
See https://gist.github.com/akesandgren/19214eae9cd75ad3c6cd583b826d5f57 for a full test report.

[akesandgren]

@smoors updated the pytorch version

[akesandgren]

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
b-cn1603.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core Processor, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, 525.147.05, Python 3.10.12
See https://gist.github.com/akesandgren/dc323f87246a9beec84fc67a2ca5e950 for a full test report.

[smoors]

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17457 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17457 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 12610

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1891548321 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/45559dcfa1df371428111f12753bd3d2 for a full test report.

[smoors]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=17457 EB_ARGS= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_17457 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 4086

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1892263593 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/6d6def6bc2fa46e577574ecef576b6f1 for a full test report.

[smoors]

lgtm

[smoors]

Going in, thanks @akesandgren!