Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{data}[GCCcore/11.3.0] pytesseract v0.3.10 w/ Python 3.10.4 #17898

Merged

Conversation

VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@Micket Micket added the update label May 11, 2023
@Micket Micket added this to the release after 4.7.2 milestone May 11, 2023
@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis-c1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.7, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/a764d17a02779c798a52d8a8aa9ca4b6 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis-s1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.7, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4314 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/703b62415430e8d26d53202a43bcdf2d for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented May 15, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17898 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17898 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 10781

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1547838510 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/429a1a06b222e95946d26fcc649fd433 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented May 15, 2023

Test report by @jfgrimm
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node068.pri.viking.alces.network - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/1bb1e3c1684e2b005c919f99c5488196 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented May 15, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=17898 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_17898 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 2597

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1547850052 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/1da123756e8933780fdcde6345587203 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented May 15, 2023

Going in, thanks @VRehnberg!

@jfgrimm jfgrimm merged commit 63ccb7c into easybuilders:develop May 15, 2023
10 checks passed
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Aug 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants