Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{lib}[foss/2022b] igraph v0.10.6, leidenalg v0.10.1, libleidenalg v0.11.1, python-igraph v0.10.6 #18548

Merged

Conversation

fizwit
Copy link
Contributor

@fizwit fizwit commented Aug 11, 2023

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel boegel changed the title update igraph, leidenalg igraph {lib}[foss/2022b] igraph v0.10.6, leidenalg v0.10.1, libleidenalg v0.11.1, python-igraph v0.10.6 Aug 15, 2023
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Aug 15, 2023
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Aug 15, 2023
@casparvl
Copy link
Contributor

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=18548 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_18548 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 11487

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1680394001 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@casparvl
Copy link
Contributor

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=18548 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_18548 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3179

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1680403185 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/866f162de52be35e6b981797aa13bf38 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/8eb43a6d47cdaf9074a000a0c710ff59 for a full test report.

@casparvl
Copy link
Contributor

Test report by @casparvl
FAILED
Build succeeded for 3 out of 6 (4 easyconfigs in total)
tcn1.local.snellius.surf.nl - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7H12 64-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/casparvl/5541848347fab625cccdac9cbf1ade29 for a full test report.

@casparvl
Copy link
Contributor

Ugh, that failure is not related to this PR at all. See #18509 (comment)

Once I fix it, I can retry a build. But, maybe another maintainer can just upload an extra test report. I think with that, we have sufficient tests here for this to be merged...

@casparvl
Copy link
Contributor

Test report by @casparvl
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
tcn1.local.snellius.surf.nl - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7H12 64-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/casparvl/c46fcb466ad3c77abce947d61b218b61 for a full test report.

@casparvl casparvl modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.8.1?) Aug 18, 2023
@casparvl
Copy link
Contributor

Going in, thanks @fizwit!

@casparvl casparvl merged commit ae2c7f8 into easybuilders:develop Aug 18, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants