New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{lib}[foss/2022b] igraph v0.10.6, leidenalg v0.10.1, libleidenalg v0.11.1, python-igraph v0.10.6 #18548
{lib}[foss/2022b] igraph v0.10.6, leidenalg v0.10.1, libleidenalg v0.11.1, python-igraph v0.10.6 #18548
Conversation
easybuild/easyconfigs/l/libleidenalg/libleidenalg-0.11.1-foss-2022b.eb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
easybuild/easyconfigs/p/python-igraph/python-igraph-0.10.6-foss-2022b.eb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1680394001 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2 |
@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1680403185 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
Test report by @boegelbot |
Test report by @casparvl |
Ugh, that failure is not related to this PR at all. See #18509 (comment) Once I fix it, I can retry a build. But, maybe another maintainer can just upload an extra test report. I think with that, we have sufficient tests here for this to be merged... |
Test report by @casparvl |
Going in, thanks @fizwit! |
(created using
eb --new-pr
)