Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move ASE from foss/2023a tol gfbf/2023a #19040

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

schiotz
Copy link
Contributor

@schiotz schiotz commented Oct 19, 2023

Since 2022b, the ASE package has been on the gfbf toolchain level, not foss.

Unfortunately, somebody beat me to adding ASE to the 2023a toolchain, and it is back at the foss level, forcing packages that depend on ASE to be at that level too. It has not yet been released, so it is not too late to move it to gfbf/2023a.

Fixes issue #19039 .

Copy link
Contributor

@Micket Micket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@Micket Micket added the change label Oct 19, 2023
@Micket Micket added this to the next release (4.8.2?) milestone Oct 19, 2023
@Micket
Copy link
Contributor

Micket commented Oct 19, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@Micket
Copy link
Contributor

Micket commented Oct 19, 2023

Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis-c1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/bfaa08198894be6423f2d5f9c49b6d0b for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19040 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19040 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 11982

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1771424623 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/c497494679099893068534218073b925 for a full test report.

@Micket
Copy link
Contributor

Micket commented Oct 19, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19040 EB_ARGS= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19040 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3586

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1771838240 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/7c3579a5d285240f388da51dcb42a628 for a full test report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants