{cae}[foss/2023a] OpenFOAM 10 w/ CGAL 5.6 and ParaView 5.11.2

[hajgato]

No description provided.

[Micket]

lgtm (

[Micket]

Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (3 easyconfigs in total)
alvis-c1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/14e5ba254a132715f0e41e5616fa35fa for a full test report.

[SebastianAchilles]

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
zen2-rockylinux-88 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/f2cef35e989106f117c976086ee149dd for a full test report.

[SebastianAchilles]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

[boegelbot]

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19062 EB_ARGS= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19062 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 3630

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1776751166 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/d459804bc8fc896fe78c0114b414489f for a full test report.

[SebastianAchilles]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19062 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19062 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 12044

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1776906310 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/d5ce226b24cc16f8ed38209ee52f446a for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3127.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/e3e60e1df797cef78ee8baf10c125cdd for a full test report.

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @hajgato!

[paulmelis]

So now there's ParaView-5.11.2-foss-2023a.eb from this pull request, but also the fat-build of ParaView-5.11.1-foss-2022b.eb (with many more features, plus patches) from #18631. That doesn't seem ideal, as I would hope the 5.11.1 with more testing and features is slated for the next EB release. @lcniel any thoughts?