Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{chem}[GCCcore/12.3.0,gfbf/2023a] CENSO v1.2.0, CREST v2.12 and move xtb v6.6.1 to gfbf/2023a #19826

Merged

Conversation

lexming
Copy link
Contributor

@lexming lexming commented Feb 9, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

Change: xtb moves down to gfbf/2023a from foss/2023a as it does not use MPI, only BLAS/LAPACK.

@lexming lexming added the update label Feb 9, 2024
@lexming lexming changed the title {chem}[GCCcore/12.3.0,gfbf/2023a] CENSO v1.2.0, CREST v2.12 {chem}[GCCcore/12.3.0,gfbf/2023a] CENSO v1.2.0, CREST v2.12 and move xtb v6.6.1 to gfbf/2023a Feb 9, 2024
@lexming lexming added the change label Feb 9, 2024
@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented Feb 9, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19826 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19826 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 12864

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1936053553 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/704a848672b6b25116e2f97861565f85 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented Feb 9, 2024

Test report by @jfgrimm
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
gpu22.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7413 24-Core Processor, 2 x NVIDIA NVIDIA H100 PCIe, 535.86.10, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/6987ebb5751062582f1cc260cb8bdf99 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented Feb 9, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=19826 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19826 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3585

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1936085757 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/63f92ee192f9f9920e25ed7f970bdb95 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jfgrimm jfgrimm added this to the release after 4.9.0 milestone Feb 9, 2024
@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented Feb 9, 2024

Going in, thanks @lexming!

@jfgrimm jfgrimm merged commit 9ec6cf4 into easybuilders:develop Feb 9, 2024
9 checks passed
@lexming lexming deleted the 20240209153404_new_pr_CENSO120 branch February 9, 2024 21:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants