Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{lib}[GCCcore 10.3.0,11.2.0,11.3.0,12.2.0,12.3.0,13.2.0] PSM2 v12.0.1 #20496

Merged

Conversation

jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm commented May 8, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

…e-11.2.0.eb, PSM2-12.0.1-GCCcore-11.3.0.eb, PSM2-12.0.1-GCCcore-12.2.0.eb, PSM2-12.0.1-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb and patches: PSM2-11.2.80_hfi-user.patch
@jfgrimm jfgrimm added the new label May 8, 2024
@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member Author

jfgrimm commented May 8, 2024

Test report by @jfgrimm
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 6 (5 easyconfigs in total)
node109.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/7f2744bed6cac9a95f3f4364018002eb for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented May 8, 2024

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/d803f98df34c3397d4ad85adb73bb9b5 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm jfgrimm marked this pull request as draft May 8, 2024 15:54
@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member Author

jfgrimm commented May 8, 2024

hmm, seems it doesn't like newer compilers

we've had it at SYSTEM-level at our site, but that won't make sense here because of the numactl runtime dep (we relied on RPATH and used a system-level numactl build dep instead). I'll need to have a look at what's going wrong

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented May 8, 2024

hmm, seems it doesn't like newer compilers

we've had it at SYSTEM-level at our site, but that won't make sense here because of the numactl runtime dep (we relied on RPATH and used a system-level numactl build dep instead). I'll need to have a look at what's going wrong

Adding binutils as a build dep fixes that issue.

Also, please update patch with description.

@jfgrimm jfgrimm changed the title {lib}[GCCcore/10.3.0,GCCcore/11.2.0,GCCcore/11.3.0,GCCcore/12.2.0,GCCcore/12.3.0] PSM2 v12.0.1 {lib}[GCCcore 10.3.0,11.2.0,11.3.0,12.2.0,12.3.0,13.2.0] PSM2 v12.0.1 May 9, 2024
@jfgrimm jfgrimm force-pushed the 20240508163630_new_pr_PSM21201 branch from 9577254 to 58705e1 Compare May 9, 2024 10:53
@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented May 9, 2024

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/25bb214f143ebeecc242c074a8870c9e for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented May 9, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member Author

jfgrimm commented May 9, 2024

Test report by @jfgrimm
FAILED
Build succeeded for 6 out of 8 (6 easyconfigs in total)
node048.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/64d65780758a23dbea11b4645e2d1249 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20496 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20496 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4093

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2102443445 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

boegelbot commented May 9, 2024

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 5 out of 7 (6 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/ebe51eae8a978acc71cf3a856136805c for a full test report.

build failure in CUDA/11.3.1 unrelated to this PR

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member Author

jfgrimm commented May 9, 2024

Test report by @jfgrimm
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 7 out of 7 (6 easyconfigs in total)
node048.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/00a0356041292a0f81f228dec4819f1f for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented May 9, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20496 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20496 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13433

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2102490303 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented May 9, 2024

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/19989e1dfd3728608124871c352d30d2 for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj added this to the release after 4.9.1 milestone May 9, 2024
@jfgrimm jfgrimm marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2024 11:42
@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 7 out of 7 (6 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/7e3f6034cdf4431cafaf5deffa5c0b85 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented May 9, 2024

Going in, thanks @jfgrimm!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit f10ddb8 into easybuilders:develop May 9, 2024
9 checks passed
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jrc0870.jureca - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (neoverse_n1), 2 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-PCIE-40GB, 535.154.05, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/0f8f6502c9600b8b6f6e3c6851e63236 for a full test report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants