Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{toolchain} GCC v13.3.0 #20559

Merged

Conversation

SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

(created using eb --new-pr)
GCC v13.3.0 toochain

…ore-13.3.0.eb, help2man-1.49.3-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb, M4-1.4.19-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb, Bison-3.8.2-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb, flex-2.6.4-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb, binutils-2.42-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb
Copy link
Contributor

@Micket Micket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_BRANCH=5.0.x
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ "5.0.x" != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH="5.0.x" ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/"5.0.x" source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20559 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH="5.0.x" /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20559 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4156

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2122222472 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
bwd-rockylinux-94 - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4 (Blue Onyx), x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6900K CPU @ 3.20GHz (broadwell), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/4b70ee850b90b08b7c71f9491294fe62 for a full test report.

@Micket
Copy link
Contributor

Micket commented May 21, 2024

Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
alvis-skylake-build - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/7c6e8abc7b0e405c45e56510b5ed9a7c for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20559 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20559 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13497

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2122313740 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/bc9edd32795d68accfb666c630d9fcf9 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/05ce5b04d17678622d0833d52538444f for a full test report.

@Micket Micket merged commit e72c6a1 into easybuilders:develop May 21, 2024
9 checks passed
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
skl-rockylinux-89 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz (skylake), 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4000, 550.54.15, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/d169c001117ab0c6771012bce1956c63 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
zen2-ubuntu-2404 - Linux Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (Noble Numbat), x86_64, AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.12.3
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/150a6e24dc697e0528c0a49ad40d9275 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented May 21, 2024

Test report by @jfgrimm
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (8 easyconfigs in total)
node119.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/45d2e208bc67b202553c73d78068e0d6 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
jrc0880.jureca - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8452Y (sapphirerapids), 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA H100 PCIe, 535.154.05, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/a4028d483fb828e6c84938e71b76e701 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added the 2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains label May 21, 2024
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
jrc0870.jureca - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (neoverse_n1), 2 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-PCIE-40GB, 535.154.05, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/f23da094a94a513cbb1b17ab9fca03ea for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 21, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (8 easyconfigs in total)
aarch64-neoverse-n1-node1.int.aws-rocky88-202310.eessi.io - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (neoverse_n1), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/271fe385e05ccf3ca8289d5e4f6f1371 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 21, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
node3147.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/72666da2e45183e887f3afc51ea18736 for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented May 21, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (8 easyconfigs in total)
bob-Latitude-5300 - Linux Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8665U CPU @ 1.90GHz, Python 3.10.12
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/a5cc1f1b98831b1a968a2ec6279490d1 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
arriesgado-3 - Linux Ubuntu 22.04, RISC-V-64, UNKNOWN (u74mc), Python 3.10.12
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/fbc1dffc386d201049c03c714fe1f053 for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented May 22, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 10 (8 easyconfigs in total)
starfive - Linux Debian GNU/Linux n/a, RISC-V-64, UNKNOWN, Python 3.10.9
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/3b4b8d885010a016174f23b2078de349 for a full test report.

edit:

that looks like networks problems maybe?

Yes, I think so, trying again...

@Micket
Copy link
Contributor

Micket commented May 22, 2024

that looks like networks problems maybe?

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented May 22, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
starfive - Linux Debian GNU/Linux n/a, RISC-V-64, UNKNOWN, Python 3.10.9
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/217b79b1050f9c7de0a83a769bbdef3a for a full test report.

failed because I was building with EB 4.9.0, which doesn't include a RISC-V-related fix in the easyblock.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented May 23, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
starfive - Linux Debian GNU/Linux n/a, RISC-V-64, UNKNOWN, Python 3.10.9
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/89ef9bf5886ea0766ecbd7f39f2176bd for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/0aff395e4398b8a04697051678c6f6e2 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0207u28a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor (zen4), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/a716c3356e67d7ee89cf26e8128cb2db for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/41b87f3c3871da42bc2628881163064f for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0207u20a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480CL (sapphirerapids), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/f19c8ec2d41cc4e4ea4584af651a38df for a full test report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants