Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{ai}[foss/2023a] LangChain v0.2.1 #20702

Merged

Conversation

WilleBell
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@WilleBell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @WilleBell
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node602.hydra.os - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9384X 32-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/WilleBell/ce16de96ac760714d84f884f911be4ac for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

verdurin commented Jun 4, 2024

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/aeceaa7c065d20d4d50ef3000aeee4d6 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

verdurin commented Jun 4, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20702 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20702 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13621

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2147328041 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/c3a289db6fc9fe7779061d5e3e2e8134 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

verdurin commented Jun 4, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20702 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20702 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4276

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2147760421 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/cacc96177eca6a83ac8b54fb961bf793 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@verdurin verdurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

@verdurin verdurin added the new label Jun 5, 2024
@verdurin verdurin added this to the release after 4.9.1 milestone Jun 5, 2024
@verdurin
Copy link
Member

verdurin commented Jun 5, 2024

Going in, thanks @WilleBell!

@verdurin verdurin merged commit b519c1b into easybuilders:develop Jun 5, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants