-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 685
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{data}[foss/2023a] spaCy v3.7.4 #20774
{data}[foss/2023a] spaCy v3.7.4 #20774
Conversation
Test report by @lcniel |
Test report by @lcniel |
Test report by @lcniel |
Test report by @lcniel |
('SciPy-bundle', '2023.07'), | ||
('tqdm', '4.66.1'), | ||
('pydantic', '2.5.3'), | ||
('hatchling', '1.18.0') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hatchling
should most probably be a builddep instead of a dep
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought so too but see line 484 https://gist.github.com/lcniel/c44522f699832ce8cfb28b110c7d5bf6:
hatch-fancy-pypi-readme 24.1.0 requires hatchling, which is not installed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be a bit painful to have hatchling as runtime dep, it would collide with anything else which might pull different versions (as it's typically ok for something that's just a build dep).
In this case:
hatch-fancy-pypi-readme 24.1.0 requires hatchling, which is not installed.
this is an indirect dep for something that looks like a hatchling.
Either we split out hatch-fancy-pypi-readme as it's own package (like hatch-jupyter-builder-0.9.1-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb) and only use that as a builddep, or just skip this completely as it really does not seem necessary for the build. Making some fancy readme for pypi i guess? Nothing we will ever see of notice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will try to patch it out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like it just works now without any added patching needed, just taking out the dep. Weird, will test more
Test report by @lcniel |
Test report by @lcniel |
Test report by @lcniel |
Test report by @lcniel |
Test report by @lcniel |
@boegelbot: please test @ generoso |
@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 2175472672 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @zao |
Test report by @boegelbot |
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 2175548354 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Going in, thanks @lcniel! |
(created using
eb --new-pr
)