Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add GMP and MPFR as dependencies to OpenFOAM v2306 and v2312 #20841

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

@bedroge bedroge commented Jun 17, 2024

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 18, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16
EB_ARGS="OpenFOAM-v2306-foss-2022b.eb OpenFOAM-v2312-foss-2023a.eb OpenFOAM-11-foss-2023a.eb"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20841 EB_ARGS="OpenFOAM-v2306-foss-2022b.eb OpenFOAM-v2312-foss-2023a.eb OpenFOAM-11-foss-2023a.eb" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20841 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13760

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2175485285 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/7cb2663e76ff4e62047e4f553c06e887 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 18, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16
EB_ARGS="OpenFOAM-v2306-foss-2022b.eb OpenFOAM-v2312-foss-2023a.eb OpenFOAM-11-foss-2023a.eb --include-easyblocks-from-pr 3366"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20841 EB_ARGS="OpenFOAM-v2306-foss-2022b.eb OpenFOAM-v2312-foss-2023a.eb OpenFOAM-11-foss-2023a.eb --include-easyblocks-from-pr 3366" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20841 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13765

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2175980799 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 18, 2024

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3366
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3107.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/77b416f4c3b02d086e43454c71fca803 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3366
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/c9c601b177e74c3d8ac4449ce85d9d47 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 18, 2024

Going in, thanks @bedroge!

@boegel boegel merged commit f0e91e6 into easybuilders:develop Jun 18, 2024
9 checks passed
@bedroge bedroge deleted the openfoam_gmp_mpfr branch June 18, 2024 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug fix EESSI Related to EESSI project
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants