Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{numlib}[GCCcore/13.2.0] Triangle v1.6 #20849

Merged

Conversation

SimonPinches
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 24, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@bedroge bedroge added the update label Jun 24, 2024
@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bedroge: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20849 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20849 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13798

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2186240121 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/f84bb52d8e0089399edb6544f96a07c4 for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 24, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 24, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bob-Latitude-5300 - Linux Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8665U CPU @ 1.90GHz, Python 3.10.12
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/84c2bad4ea442d80fb1371a88ae8c678 for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 24, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
interactive1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/847ba7bb1f6dbcaadce6bb2ff9f534f1 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bedroge: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20849 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20849 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4446

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2186342207 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/e3adc500ad24ea2be58bdd25159b3aac for a full test report.

@bedroge bedroge added this to the release after 4.9.2 milestone Jun 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@bedroge bedroge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jun 24, 2024

Going in, thanks @SimonPinches!

@bedroge bedroge merged commit a45e75f into easybuilders:develop Jun 24, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants