Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add easyconfig files for openmc software stack #20965

Open
wants to merge 25 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LukeLabrie
Copy link
Contributor

This pr introduces a set of easyconfig files for the OpenMC software stack. OpenMC is a monte-carlo particle transport software. It can be configured with or without DAGMC, a geometry engine for running particle transport on CAD models, and thus includes an easyconfig and relevant dependencies for both cases.

('fmt','9.1.0'),
('gsl-lite','0.41.0'),
('pugixml','1.12.1'),
('xtensor','0.24.7')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Try to always include the comma for the last element when having them on multiple lines. E.g. here the mcpl line has changed although it didn't really.

Suggested change
('xtensor','0.24.7')
('xtensor','0.24.7'),

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
diff --unified --recursive --text openmc-0.15.0.orig/CMakeLists.txt openmc-0.15.0.new/CMakeLists.txt
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this patch from upstream? If so please include a link (and a description in general)

If not, wouldn't it be easier to just remove the check instead of this large patch (due to aligning existing options) and passing an extra configure flag? If the patch is just for EB the flexibility isn't necessary, is it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants