New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{chem} [intel/2016] PSI4-20160201 (REVIEW) #2445
Conversation
@boegel review please |
Test report by @wpoely86 |
Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed. See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5955/console for more details. Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
retest this please |
dependencies = [ | ||
(python, pyver), | ||
('zlib', '1.2.8'), | ||
('Boost', '1.59.0', versionsuffix), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1.60?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there are issues with 1.60
Test report by @wpoely86 |
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5956/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
Test report by @wpoely86 |
Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed. See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5964/console for more details. Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
Jenkins: test this please |
Test report by @wpoely86 |
mm, not sure why |
Test report by @wpoely86 |
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5975/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5976/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
@wpoely86: care to resubmit a test report for SL6.7? |
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5979/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
Test report by @wpoely86 |
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5981/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5987/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
@wpoely86: now PSI4 fails on SL6? |
* develop: Fix typo Add missing dep for Szip Serial version of HDF5 1.8.16 with intel/2016a arpack-ng 3.3 for intel/2016a add easyconfig HDF5-1.8.16-intel-2016a.eb, add easyconfig Szip-2.1-intel-2016a.eb add easyconfig CMake-3.4.3-intel-2016a.eb use sanity_check_commands instead of runtest fixed merge conflicts added extra sanity checks
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6002/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
@boegel quota was full. I'm rerunning it now but it will be fine. |
Test report by @wpoely86 |
aaaah, this is why I don't like splitting up PR's. SL6 is fine. |
@wpoely86: it's not fine, the test report failed... |
Test report by @wpoely86 |
SL6 is fine. It fails because of things unrelated to this PR. I've already run way more tests then needed for this. |
Going in, thanks @wpoely86! |
{chem} [intel/2016] PSI4-20160201 (REVIEW)
Test report by @smoors |
@smoors Make sure you update to latest |
Needs easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#824