New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{devel,vis}[GCCcore/5.4.0] GLib v2.49.5, PCRE v8.39 (WIP) #4695
Conversation
Test report by @vanzod |
] | ||
|
||
#GLib compiles correctly even without this dependency | ||
#builddependencies = [('Python', '2.7.12')] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vanzod It does, because EasyBuild requires a Python 2.x to be available as well, but we shouldn't rely on the system Python here?
In the hopefully not so distant future, you'll be able to run EasyBuild on top of a system Python 3, which would break this build?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. However that would require Python at the GCCcore level. I would rather build it against a bare python at the GCC
or iccifort
level.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, yes, that compilates things a bit...
Although, a bare Python at GCCcore
should be fine, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess so but on our cluster at the moment we provide it at the GCC
and iccifort
level.
I can easily add Python-2.7.12-GCCcore-5.4.0
to this PR if you wish to merge it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, yeah, that will work too, I'd rather do that than commenting out the build dep, that'll backfire sometime in the future imho...
Before pushing a |
@vanzod, this PR is being closed for the following reason(s): no activity for > 1 year. |
(created using
eb --new-pr
)