Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

{lang}[foss/2017b,intel/2017b] cysignals v1.10.2, Cython v0.29.10, gmpy2 v2.1.0b1, ... w/ Python 2.7.14 + 3.6.3 #8459

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jun 19, 2019
Merged

{lang}[foss/2017b,intel/2017b] cysignals v1.10.2, Cython v0.29.10, gmpy2 v2.1.0b1, ... w/ Python 2.7.14 + 3.6.3 #8459

merged 4 commits into from Jun 19, 2019

Conversation

murfreesboro
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@murfreesboro
adding easyconfigs: cysignals-1.10.2-foss-2017b-Python-2.7.14.eb, cys…
82ff652 
…ignals-1.10.2-foss-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb, cysignals-1.10.2-intel-2017b-Python-2.7.14.eb, cysignals-1.10.2-intel-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb, Cython-0.29.10-foss-2017b-Python-2.7.14.eb, Cython-0.29.10-foss-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb, Cython-0.29.10-intel-2017b-Python-2.7.14.eb, Cython-0.29.10-intel-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb, gmpy2-2.1.0b1-foss-2017b-Python-2.7.14.eb, gmpy2-2.1.0b1-foss-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb, gmpy2-2.1.0b1-intel-2017b-Python-2.7.14.eb, gmpy2-2.1.0b1-intel-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb, ppl-1.2-GCCcore-6.4.0.eb, pplpy-0.8.4-foss-2017b-Python-2.7.14.eb, pplpy-0.8.4-foss-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb, pplpy-0.8.4-intel-2017b-Python-2.7.14.eb, pplpy-0.8.4-intel-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb
@murfreesboro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @murfreesboro
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 17 out of 17 (17 easyconfigs in this PR)
dev806.vampire - Linux centos linux 7.4.1708, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/8a1a900e4e1b485d213c9a3f61f4f7ee for a full test report.

@vanzod vanzod requested a review from boegel June 17, 2019 20:29
boegel
boegel requested changes Jun 18, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@murfreesboro The Python easyconfigs also include a Cython version already.

Since you're including a more recent version here, I assume the one included is too old?

If that's indeed the case, please add a comment in the easyconfig file(s) where relevant to explain why a different version of Cython is included.

easybuild/easyconfigs/p/ppl/ppl-1.2-GCCcore-6.4.0.eb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (3.9.3) milestone Jun 19, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 19, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 17 out of 17 (17 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3139.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/d3fe74426262175772ae2d1248c66543 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 19, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 17 out of 17 (17 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2419.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ed9e2dd3b9ba6e4d5fab4e8afb5128ca for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 19, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 17 out of 17 (17 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2077.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/b208c06641420f74aee4f5c5af190b51 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 19, 2019

Going in, thanks @murfreesboro!

@boegel boegel merged commit 0a37e73 into easybuilders:develop Jun 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@boegel boegel boegel approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
new update
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.9.3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@murfreesboro @boegel