Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{bio}[fosscuda/2019b] CuCLARK v1.1 #9482

Merged

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Dec 11, 2019

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel boegel added the new label Dec 11, 2019
@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v4 @ 2.00GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/71ce52604731e890b5522fcc84dd62b4 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

ah, sorry, missed the "WIP" in the title. Is is still?

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta added this to the 4.x milestone Dec 30, 2019
@boegel boegel changed the title {bio}[fosscuda/2019b] CuCLARK v1.1 (WIP) {bio}[fosscuda/2019b] CuCLARK v1.1 Aug 11, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 11, 2021

I guess it's good enough to go in as is...

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 11, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3302.joltik.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6242 CPU @ 2.80GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/eab212ba7a0f3efa05663356e179d66e for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 11, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=9482 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_9482 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 18080

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 896689223 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-5 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/61ec33f25d80364fbdbf488eb7ae725d for a full test report.

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
b-cn1501.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6132 CPU @ 2.60GHz, 2 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-PCIE-16GB, 470.182.03, Python 3.8.10
See https://gist.github.com/akesandgren/ae033dbe013b040c182a4ef256eb1be2 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 21, 2023

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3901.accelgor.os - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7413 24-Core Processor (zen3), 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-80GB, 530.30.02, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/e4791cbc112648b4d1e3ed3f777fc293 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 21, 2023

@akesandgren ready to merge?

Copy link
Contributor

@akesandgren akesandgren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@akesandgren akesandgren merged commit 9bce92e into easybuilders:develop Jun 21, 2023
5 checks passed
@boegel boegel deleted the 20191211164257_new_pr_CuCLARK11 branch June 22, 2023 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants