New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skip symlinked files when fixing permissions #1439
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
06abf77
Skip symlinked files when fixing permissions
geimer 31b2a54
Fix @boegel's remarks
geimer 61813d7
add test for adjust_permissions
boegel 95c93cd
Merge pull request #3 from boegel/symlink_permissions
geimer 8a16a77
Avoid negations in logic to make code more readable
geimer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ def convert_name(name, upper=False): | |
|
||
|
||
def adjust_permissions(name, permissionBits, add=True, onlyfiles=False, onlydirs=False, recursive=True, | ||
group_id=None, relative=True, ignore_errors=False): | ||
group_id=None, relative=True, ignore_errors=False, skip_symlinks=True): | ||
""" | ||
Add or remove (if add is False) permissionBits from all files (if onlydirs is False) | ||
and directories (if onlyfiles is False) in path | ||
|
@@ -700,9 +700,17 @@ def adjust_permissions(name, permissionBits, add=True, onlyfiles=False, onlydirs | |
for root, dirs, files in os.walk(name): | ||
paths = [] | ||
if not onlydirs: | ||
paths += files | ||
if not skip_symlinks: | ||
paths.extend(files) | ||
else: | ||
for path in files: | ||
if not os.path.islink(os.path.join(root, path)): | ||
paths.append(path) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. let's add an else:
_log.debug("Not adjusting permissions for symlink %s", path) |
||
else: | ||
_log.debug("Not adjusting permissions for symlink %s", path) | ||
if not onlyfiles: | ||
paths += dirs | ||
# os.walk skips symlinked dirs by default, i.e., no special handling needed here | ||
paths.extend(dirs) | ||
|
||
for path in paths: | ||
allpaths.append(os.path.join(root, path)) | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, maybe it's better to avoid 'double negation' (sort of):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes some sense. But after switching this, we have yet another negation inside the for loop -- which has now moved up. Though I would suggest to keep it that way to have the part where something has to be done first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking about it, it may actually make sense to switch that too (If we are skipping symlinks and if it is a link, issue a debug message; otherwise do it)