You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hello, I would like to ask if there is an interface for creating junk rules through the API?
Describe the solution you'd like
I saw that the rule created by this rule is only valid in the rule list and not in the junk list.
Describe alternatives you've considered
By reading the code, I found a method "bulk_mark_as_junk", but the official document states that blocked emails need to already exist, and my scenario is that certain the person or domain is not sending me emails, but I need to configure it so that I receive emails properly and not get marked as junk.
Additional context
That is like this:
Is it possible to implement?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know where this lands when you look at it in Outlook. You could try to create a junk rule in Outlook and use exchangelib to see if that rule is exposed via account.rules. If not, then EWS probably does not expose this type of rule.
Repository owner
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 11, 2024
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hello, I would like to ask if there is an interface for creating junk rules through the API?
Describe the solution you'd like
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/34082198/320254433-2dd0913c-defc-4125-a7d9-62cf9a139526.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjU2MzE2MjcsIm5iZiI6MTcyNTYzMTMyNywicGF0aCI6Ii8zNDA4MjE5OC8zMjAyNTQ0MzMtMmRkMDkxM2MtZGVmYy00MTI1LWE3ZDktNjJjZjlhMTM5NTI2LnBuZz9YLUFtei1BbGdvcml0aG09QVdTNC1ITUFDLVNIQTI1NiZYLUFtei1DcmVkZW50aWFsPUFLSUFWQ09EWUxTQTUzUFFLNFpBJTJGMjAyNDA5MDYlMkZ1cy1lYXN0LTElMkZzMyUyRmF3czRfcmVxdWVzdCZYLUFtei1EYXRlPTIwMjQwOTA2VDE0MDIwN1omWC1BbXotRXhwaXJlcz0zMDAmWC1BbXotU2lnbmF0dXJlPWYyNDQ3ZDU3ZGMzZjRjZmE3N2VjNzkyNjgwMDY5ZDU1NWRiY2M5YjdjYTYyYzAxNTA1OGU0NTcxMzY1YjI5YTcmWC1BbXotU2lnbmVkSGVhZGVycz1ob3N0JmFjdG9yX2lkPTAma2V5X2lkPTAmcmVwb19pZD0wIn0.q6EFyU-5WmwZLdkxlBqJfWhS0IpGpNi6iEzK7nfE8B4)
I saw that the rule created by this rule is only valid in the rule list and not in the junk list.
Describe alternatives you've considered
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/34082198/320254298-ced501c0-1019-477c-b528-b8175be3ebe5.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.0ZtE4SzXoclCkDm8ZtFnpkTZ8nUpxrDJLkzTI5jbB30)
By reading the code, I found a method "bulk_mark_as_junk", but the official document states that blocked emails need to already exist, and my scenario is that certain the person or domain is not sending me emails, but I need to configure it so that I receive emails properly and not get marked as junk.
Additional context
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/34082198/320254626-2940108f-fce9-4e46-94ea-f930ba9ef409.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.90oAfgg_hS4FG_nsrzkt3g-gv09-qpITIDZvt3g3qcU)
That is like this:
Is it possible to implement?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: