Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed typo - comment said you could use size to denote sepal width #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 8, 2012
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
Expand Up @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ To see where each species is located in this graph, we can color each point by a

[![Sepal vs. Petal, Colored by Species](http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10506/blog/r/ggplot2/sepal-vs-petal-specied.png)](http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10506/blog/r/ggplot2/sepal-vs-petal-specied.png)

Similarly, we can let the size of each point denote sepal width, by adding a `size = Sepal.Width` argument.
Similarly, we can let the size of each point denote petal width, by adding a `size = Petal.Width` argument.

qplot(Sepal.Length, Petal.Length, data = iris, color = Species, size = Petal.Width)
# We see that Iris setosa flowers have the narrowest petals.
Expand Down