Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Repository should have dedicated target definition #34

Closed
ruspl-afed opened this issue Mar 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Repository should have dedicated target definition #34

ruspl-afed opened this issue Mar 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@ruspl-afed
Copy link
Member

Currently we have one composite repository defined right in the parent pom like

 <!-- this should probably be replaced by target files -->
  <repositories>
	<repository>
	  <id>eclipse.core</id>
	  <layout>p2</layout>
	  <url>https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2022-06/</url>
	</repository>
  </repositories>

However, a repository with eclipse bundles should have its dedicated target definition with explicitly listed required IUs

ruspl-afed added a commit to ruspl-afed/eclipse-cdt-lsp that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2023
Added releng/org.eclipse.cdt.lsp.target
Renamed root module to "org.eclipse.cdt.lsp.root" for consistency

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fedorov <alexander.fedorov@arsysop.ru>
ruspl-afed added a commit to ruspl-afed/eclipse-cdt-lsp that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2023
Added releng/org.eclipse.cdt.lsp.target
Renamed root module to "org.eclipse.cdt.lsp.root" for consistency

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fedorov <alexander.fedorov@arsysop.ru>
ghentschke pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2023
Added releng/org.eclipse.cdt.lsp.target
Renamed root module to "org.eclipse.cdt.lsp.root" for consistency

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fedorov <alexander.fedorov@arsysop.ru>
@jonahgraham jonahgraham added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Sep 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants