New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#12: provide initial version of top-level pom for EE4J projects #13
Conversation
…ojects Signed-off-by: Lukas Jungmann <lukas.jungmann@oracle.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
parent/pom.xml
Outdated
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | ||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> | ||
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> | ||
<groupId>org.eclipse.jakartaee</groupId> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this something that should be run through the Jakarta EE WG?
The groupId here should match the groupId for future specifications.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say that it should be org.eclipse.ee4j and match groupid for future implementations. Subprojects can override it anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, org.eclipse.ee4j sounds much better. We should leave the jakarta name out for ee4j projects.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Jungmann <lukas.jungmann@oracle.com>
change gId to |
parent/pom.xml
Outdated
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> | ||
<packaging>pom</packaging> | ||
|
||
<name>Jakarta EE Project</name> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this say EE4J project?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! Yes, it should...
Signed-off-by: Lukas Jungmann <lukas.jungmann@oracle.com>
fixed project name in 67d408f |
Merged. @lukasj, you can proceed and deploy it to Maven Central. |
Signed-off-by: Lukas Jungmann lukas.jungmann@oracle.com